- What is the difference between this and an atlas or gazetteer?
- An atlas describes what a place is. This tracker describes what changed there. An atlas is useful once, before the campaign starts. The tracker is what you actually need five sessions in, when the party is about to walk back into a town they last saw four sessions ago and you cannot remember who is still waiting for them.
- How many locations should I keep in the tracker?
- As many as have an open thread, a returning character, or a change the party will notice. When a location has gone three sessions with none of those, archive the row. A campaign with fifty named places rarely needs more than twenty live rows.
- Do I need a row for every named tavern, inn, and shop?
- No. Add a place the first time something happens there the party will remember next session. The tavern where the party only drank a round and left is a line in your session note, not a row in the tracker. If the owner later becomes relevant, open the row then.
- Does this work outside D&D?
- Yes. The structure is system-agnostic. Pathfinder, Call of Cthulhu, Blades in the Dark, and most campaign-based tabletop RPGs use the same change-first layer for places.
- How does this connect to my map?
- The tracker is the change log. The map is the spatial reference. A good workflow keeps both: the map shows where a place is; the tracker shows what changed last time you were there. They update on different rhythms, and that is fine.
- Do I need a tool, or will a document work?
- A document works. Many DMs run the tracker as a single markdown file sorted by location name, or one block per location in a campaign notes file. A campaign manager helps once rows start linking to NPCs, sessions, quests, encounters, maps and pins, plus faction references, and you want those connections to stay current without retyping them.