Skip to main content

Comparison Guide

Obsidian Alternative for D&D Campaign Notes

Obsidian is excellent for local markdown notes. If you love building your own system, it may be exactly right. Multiloop is for DMs who want the campaign structure already built: sessions, NPCs, quests, timelines, maps, player roles, and shared table memory.

Why DMs move from Obsidian to Multiloop

  • Campaign-specific structure on day one: sessions, NPCs, factions, quests, locations, handouts, timelines, maps, and player-facing notes are already separate surfaces
  • DM and player roles are built into the campaign model instead of being recreated with folders, vaults, publish settings, or plugin conventions
  • The campaign canvas gives you a table-facing relationship map. Obsidian graph view is powerful, but it is a note graph rather than a TTRPG relationship board
  • Built-in random tables, import flows, and campaign sharing. Obsidian can reach some of this through plugins, but Multiloop ships it as the product workflow
  • Hosted collaboration without asking every player to understand markdown, sync, plugins, or your personal folder structure

Head to Head

Campaign Structure

Multiloop

Create a campaign and the core surfaces already exist: sessions, NPCs, quests, lore, locations, maps, factions, timelines, handouts, party, and player views.

Obsidian

Obsidian gives you folders, markdown files, links, tags, backlinks, graph view, and plugins. The campaign structure is whatever you design and maintain.

Table Collaboration

Multiloop

Players can join a campaign, see the right information for their role, write perspectives, claim characters, and use shared campaign pages without learning the DM notebook.

Obsidian

Obsidian can sync and publish notes, but it is primarily a personal or small-team note workspace. Campaign-specific DM/player roles are not native.

Search and Memory

Multiloop

Session notes, character records, quests, factions, locations, and timelines stay connected in the same campaign system, so the story remains searchable by entity and context.

Obsidian

Obsidian is excellent for linked markdown knowledge bases. It is strongest when the DM wants full control and is comfortable designing their own note taxonomy.

Choose Obsidian if…

  • You want local markdown files you fully control
  • You enjoy building your own campaign system with folders, tags, links, plugins, and custom conventions
  • Your notes are mostly private DM reference material rather than a shared table workflow

Choose Multiloop if…

  • You want a campaign manager that already understands sessions, NPCs, quests, maps, timelines, and player roles
  • You want players involved without asking them to learn your markdown vault
  • You want campaign canvas, import, sharing, and 36,500 entries across 51 tables without assembling a plugin stack

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Multiloop better than Obsidian for every DM?

No. Obsidian is excellent if you want a private, local-first markdown notebook and enjoy designing your own system. Multiloop is better when you want a hosted campaign workflow with sessions, NPCs, quests, player roles, and shared campaign memory already built in.

Can I use Obsidian and Multiloop together?

Yes. A DM can keep private long-form writing in Obsidian and use Multiloop for active campaign operations: session notes, player perspectives, NPC tracking, quests, timelines, maps, and shared table context.

Can I import Obsidian notes into Multiloop?

Multiloop supports pasted text, Word documents, PDFs, and compatible public URLs. Markdown notes can be copied or exported into a format Multiloop can read, then organized into campaign records.

Does Multiloop have backlinks like Obsidian?

Multiloop focuses on campaign-specific links: characters, locations, factions, sessions, quests, and timeline events. Obsidian has more general-purpose backlinking. Multiloop gives those links a TTRPG shape.